Applicants sought relief in a criminal application; the Court was not inclined to grant any relief after hearing counsel, who sought leave to withdraw with liberty to pursue appropriate Cr.P.C. remedies before the trial Court.
Leave and liberty granted to withdraw and pursue appropriate remedy under Cr.P.C. before the trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sns 38-apl-622-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.622 OF 2024
Mehtabchand Motilal Jain And Anr. …..Applicants
Vs.
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents
Mr. Amit Ashok Karva for the Applicants. Mr. V. N. Sagare APP, for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 19th AUGUST, 2024.
P.C.:-
this Court was not inclined to grant any relief, learned Advocate on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the Application with liberty to avail appropriate remedy under the provisions of the Cr.P.C. before the trial Court.
(DR NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
Digitally signed by SHAMBHAVI SHAMBHAVI NILESH NILESH SHIVGAN SHIVGAN Date: 2024.08.20 19:14:12 +0530
1/1
Mehtabchand Motilal Jain And Anr.
The State Of Maharashtra
Anr.
A. S. Gadkari
Dr Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
