Manoj Tukaram Yadav and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sns 28-apl-590-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.590 OF 2023
Manoj Tukaram Yadav And Anr …..Applicants
Vs.
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents
Mr. Laxman Kalel for the Applicants. Mr. S.A.Karmakar APP, for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Siddharth Shitole, for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 19th AUGUST, 2024.
P.C.:-
- After hearing learned Advocate for Applicants at length when
this Court was not inclined to grant any relief as prayed for, learned Advocate on instructions seeks leave to withdraw Application with liberty to contest R.C.C.No.182 of 2023 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Vita.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Manoj Tukaram Yadav
- applicant
Anr
- respondent
The State Of Maharashtra
- respondent
Anr
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court