This application seeks to quash a charge-sheet alleging offences of molestation, hurt, and criminal intimidation. The applicant claims the FIR was filed falsely under false pretext of marriage. Notice was issued but waived by the prosecution. The matter was adjourned to 20.02.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 910.apl.54.2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.54 OF 2024
Bramha Kisan Borkar and ors.
..vs..
State of Maharashtra and anr.
Mr. M.P. Kariya, Advocate for the applicants. Mrs. Kolhe, Addl.P.P. for the State.
CORAM: VINAY JOSHI AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J J. DATED : 23/01/2024.
Heard.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (VINAY JOSHI, J.)
Signed by: Trupti D. Agrawal Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 23/01/2024 18:05:24 Trupti
2 issues framed by the court
Whether notice should be issued for quashing of a charge-sheet arising out of an FIR alleging offences under Sections 354, 354-A, 452, 504, 506 IPC.
Whether the applicant is entitled to remain in response to the notice as the prosecution waives it.
Bramha Kisan Borkar and ors.
State of Maharashtra and anr.
Vinay Joshi
Vrushali V. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
