Applicants sought leave to withdraw their criminal application; the High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
928-APL443-2022.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 443 OF 2022
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.04.05 10:47:59 +0530
Harshad Kashinath Naik anr. ...Applicants Versus Rupji Constructions and ors. …Respondents
Mr. Bakul Bhosale, for the Applicants. Mr. Shailesh Ghag, APP for the State.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 4th APRIL, 2024
PC:-
seeks leave to withdraw the application.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
1/1
Harshad Kashinath Naik
Santosh Subhash Kulkarni
Rupji Constructions
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
