Mahesh Madhukar Patke v. Rupji Constructions and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court in Criminal Application No. 333 of 2020 dismissed an application that stood withdrawn by the applicant on instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
925-APL333-2020.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 333 OF 2020
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.04.05 10:47:59 +0530
Mahesh Madhukar Patke ...Applicant
Versus
Rupji Constructions and ors. …Respondents
Mr. Bakul Bhosale, for the Applicant. Mr. R. M. Pethe, APP for the State.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 4th APRIL, 2024
PC:-
seeks leave to withdraw the application.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
1/1
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Mahesh Madhukar Patke
Rupji Constructions and ors.
N. J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court