Sandeep Jhaveri v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim order in a criminal application: time granted to respondent's counsel to file vakilpatra and affidavit-in-reply; applicant given leave to amend to annex the chargesheet filed during pendency. Matter listed for admission.
What the court decided
Gaikwad RD 5-apl-420-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.420 OF 2024
Sandeep Jhaveri …..Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents
Mr. Hrishikesh Mundargi, with Ms. Shrishti Singh i/b Mr. Madan Gupta, for the Applicant. Mr. Vinod S. Chate, APP for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Chittesh Dalmia, for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 12th NOVEMBER 2024.
P.C.:-
- Mr. Dalmia, learned counsel states that he has instructions
to appear for the Respondent No.2. He seeks time to file his vakilpatra and Affidavit-in-reply. He is given time of two weeks to file his vakilpatra and Affidavit-in-reply.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sandeep Jhaveri
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No.2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court