Criminal application withdrawn after counsel noted an appropriate application for the same reliefs had been filed; all contentions kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
910-APL-243-24.doc
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 243 OF 2024
ANIL LAXMICHAND MENDA ..APPLICANT VS.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Sajid Sayed a/w Mr. Rahul Agarwal i/b Agarwal & Dhanuka Legal, for Applicant. Ms. Megha Bajoria, APP for the State.
Mr. Amit Munde, SPP a/w Mr. Jai Vohra, for CBI.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 23, 2024
P.C. :
1. Since appropriate application has been filed for the same reliefs, learned counsel prays for withdrawal of this application. All contentions are kept open.
2. The application is allowed to be withdrawn.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
1/1
Signed by: Urmila P. Ingale Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 23/02/2024 18:46:17
Anil Laxmichand Menda
The State of Maharashtra
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
