Bail application of accused no.2 in murder case allowed due to custody duration exceeding year and trial delay. Bail granted with strict conditions restricting movement and tampering.
Applicant released on bail on furnishing PR bond of Rs.25,000 with one or more sureties in like amount subject to strict conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:8608
17-ba-1657-23.docx
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1657 OF 2023
ROSHAN LAXMAN DHULE ..APPLICANT VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT
Mr. Nitin Sejpal a/w Ms. Pooja N. Sejpal, Ms. Akshata Desai, Mr. Siddharth Gharat, for the Applicant.
Ms. Megha Bajoria, APP for the State. Mr. Nilesh Mohan Wani, HC, Neral police station, Raigad present.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 22, 2024
P.C. :
1/4
17-ba-1657-23.docx
Urmila Ingale
04/12/2022. The applicant was arrested on 07/12/2022. The allegation against the accused who are 6 in number by the complainant is that his brother-in-law deceased Harisinh Rajput was riding his motorcycle from Neral to go to his shop at Kashele. On 03/12/2022 at 7.15 p.m. while Harisinh Rajput was going to Neral on his motorcycle, some unknown persons murdered Harisinh by attacking him with a sharp edged weapon. The deceased was the owner of the jewellery shop. The gold chain of the deceased was robbed. The chain was recovered from the accused no. 1. There is no recovery from the present applicant. Learned APP submitted that tower location indicates that the applicant was present at the spot. It is further submitted that one day prior to the incident, the applicant was seen in the company of the accused no.5 consuming liquor. It is further submitted that call record shows that the applicant was in constant touch with the other accused which indicates his complicity with the o7ence in question.
2/4
Urmila Ingale 17-ba-1657-23.docx
from some other accused. There are no criminal antecedents reported against the present application. The applicant, in my opinion, can be enlarged on bail, considering that the applicant is in custody for more than 1 year and 2 months, since the date of his arrest on 07/12/2022. The trial is not likely to conclude any time soon. The investigation is complete. The charge-sheet has been Bled. Learned counsel for the applicant on instructions submitted that the applicant will not reside in the Raigad district and he will stay in Murbad. I am inclined to enlarge the applicant bail. Hence the following order.
O R D E R
(a) The application is allowed.
(b) The applicant- Roshan Laxman Dhule in connection with FIR No. I-359 of 2022 with Neral police station, District-Raigad shall be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/with one or more sureties in the like amount.
(c) The applicant shall report to the investigating oCcer of the concerned police station once in a month every Brst Monday of the month between 11.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m.
3/4
Urmila Ingale
17-ba-1657-23.docx
(d) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the facts to Court or any Police OCcer. The applicant shall not tamper with evidence.
(e) On being released on bail, the applicant shall furnish his contact number and residential address to the Investigating OCcer and shall keep him updated, in case there is any change.
(f) Except for attending the trial and for the purpose of reporting to the investigating oCcer, the applicant shall not enter Raigad District after being released on bail, till the trial concludes.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
4/4
Signed by: Urmila P. Ingale Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 23/02/2024 10:33:09
ROSHAN LAXMAN DHULE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
