Non-applicant counsel sought time to file reply; application stood over for three weeks.
The application was adjourned for three weeks at the request of the non-applicant to enable filing of reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
44-apl 237-24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 237 OF 20 24 (APL)
Vinodkumar Ramvilas Ladda and ors. -Vs-The State of Maharashtra and anr.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Mr. V.N.Patre, counsel for the applicants. Mr.I.J.Damle, A.P.P for non-applicant State. Mr.N.R.Tekade, counsel for non-applicant No.2.
CORAM VINAY JOSHI & MRS. VRUSHALI V.JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 21st MARCH, 2024.
he has filed memo for non-applicant No.2 and seeks time to file reply.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Signed by: Kavita P Tayade Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Kavita Date: 22/03/2024 11:36:23
Vinodkumar Ramvilas Ladda and ors.
The State of Maharashtra and anr.
VINAY JOSHI
VRUSHALI V JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
