Rajendra Kudlik Urade v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicant sought quashing of offences including Section 353 IPC relating to Gutkha/scented tobacco. The court declined to quash the Section 353 offence and noted the applicability of Section 328 IPC to Gutkha is pending before the Supreme Court. Matter stood over with no relief granted.
What did the court decide?
No relief granted; matter adjourned to 23 September 2024.
What the court decided
Osk 36-Apl-163-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 163 OF 2024
Rajendra Kudlik Urade
… Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Dhairyasheel V. Sutar a/w. Ms. Anjali Shaw, Ms. Latika Kabad & Mr. Deepak Jain for Applicant.
Mr. Vinod Chate, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 26th August 2024.
P.C. :
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the offence under Section 353 IPC against the applicant should be quashed.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rajendra Kudlik Urade
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
A. S. Gadkari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · A.s. Gadkari Neela Kedar Gokhale
- Order 2 — this page · A.s. Gadkari Neela Kedar Gokhale
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court