Application to quash prosecution under Sections 498-A/34 IPC arising from an FIR at Mankapur against distant relatives of the husband. Notice issued for final disposal; State counsel waived service; trial court directed not to proceed till next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 914.apl.1369.24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.1369/2024
Ms. Rashmi w/o. Parag Sonkusre and Anr. Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Mr. P. R. Puri, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. N. H. Joshi, A.P.P. for Non-applicant/State.
CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 24/09/2024.
. Heard.
2 914.apl.1369.24
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (VINAY JOSHI, J.)
RGurnule
Signed by: Mrs. R.M. MANDADE Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 25/09/2024 18:27:33
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal prosecution of the applicants, distant relatives implicated in a 498-A FIR, should be quashed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ms. Rashmi w/o. Parag Sonkusre and Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
Anr.
Vinay Joshi
Vrushali V. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
