Application to quash an FIR registered under Sections 498-A and 34 IPC alleging allegations made with ulterior motive. The court issued notice to the respondents returnable on a later date; the State's notice was waived by the APP.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 apl1112.2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.1112/2024
(Deepak S/o Dadarao Uike and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and another)
Mr. H.V. Dhage, Advocate for the applicants.
CORAM: VINAY JOSHI & MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATED: 22.8.2024.
Heard.
(MRS.VRUSHALI V.JOSHI, J.) (VINAY JOSHI, J.)
Tambaskar.
Signed by: MR. N.V. TAMBASKAR Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 30/08/2024 17:10:44
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Deepak S/o Dadarao Uike and others
State of Maharashtra
Non-applicant No.2
Vinay Joshi
Vrushali V. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
