Raju Ramlal Chandel v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps Wathoda Dist.Nagpur and Another

Bombay HC12 Sept 2024APL/1028/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim order only: application to quash chargesheet in a POCSO/IPC sexual-offence case; court heard counsel and issued notice for final disposal returnable on 12.9.2024. Decides nothing of general application.

What did the court decide?

Notice for final disposal issued to non-applicants, returnable on 12.9.2024; A.P.P. waived notice for respondent No.1.

Raju Ramlal Chandel vs the State of Maharashtra… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 apl1028.2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.1028/2024

¶4

(Raju Ramlal Chandel Vs. State of Maharashtra and another)

¶5

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶7

Court's or Judge's orders

¶8

¶9

Mr. Mohd. N. Opai, Advocate for the applicant.

¶10

CORAM: VINAY JOSHI & MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATED: 14.8.2024.

¶11

Heard.

¶12

This is an application seeking to quash chargesheet arising out of Crime No.506/2023 registered by non-applicant No.1 for the offence punishable under Sections 376(AB), 354(A) of Indian Penal Code read with Sections 4, 6 and 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.

¶13

The informant mother lodged a report on 1.9.2023 to the police station stating that on 19.8.2023 her daughter informed about the sexual abuses occurred prior to three years and, therefore, the report.

¶14

The minor has disclosed to the informant mother that prior to three years while they were travelling by vehicle to attend the marriage ceremony, the minor was sitting in the lap of applicant, by taking advantage of darkness during journey, victim was sexually abused.

¶15

The learned Counsel for the applicant would submit that though victim is a minor, the information of the incident after three years itself is improbable. It is argued that as per the informant’s own narration occurrence was disclosed to her on 19.8.2023 still for next 10 days report was not lodged. Our attention is invited to the variance in date of

¶16

2 apl1028.2024

¶17

disclosure in between the statement of informant and minor victim. Moreover, it is submitted that the statements recorded during investigation did not support the prosecution case. Lastly it is contended that informant’s nephew got married with daughter of accused and thus out of family dispute this after though report has been lodged with ulterior motive.

¶18

Issue notice for final disposal to non-applicants returnable on 12.9.2024.

¶19

Mr. A.R. Chutke, learned A.P.P. waives notice for respondent No.1.

¶20

(MRS.VRUSHALI V.JOSHI, J.) (VINAY JOSHI, J.)

¶21

Tambaskar.

¶22

Signed by: MR. N.V. TAMBASKAR Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 19/08/2024 18:26:49

Raju Ramlal Chandel v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps Wathoda Dist.Nagpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Ramlal Chandel v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps Wathoda Dist.Nagpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Hamidkhan S/O Deulatkhan vs Abdul Matin S/O. Shaikh Nasim and Others

Rohit S/O Sureshrao Bargat vs the State of Maharashtra through Pso Ps Saoner Dist Nagpur and Another

Ravi S/O Shankar Shinde(Husbund) and 5 Others vs the State of Maharashtra through Its P I Police Station Pusad Dist Yavatmal and Another

Sau. Varsha Avinash Sakhare and 1 vs the State of Maharashtra Pso, Ps, Bhandara Tah. and Dist. Bhandara and 1

Sandip Premratan Bhure vs the State of Maharashtra through Pso Mohadi Ps Tq Mohadi Dist Bhandara and Another

Vishalkumar Chandrakant Nikose vs State of Maha Thr Police Station Officer Ps, Gadchiroli Dist. Gadchiroli and Another