Sandip Dinkar Dalvi v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicant in a criminal application sought time to implead the first informant as a respondent. The court granted leave to amend, directing the amendment within one week and adjourning the matter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by HEMANT HEMANT CHANDERSEN CHANDERSEN SHIV SHIV Date: 2024.10.01 10:19:10 +0530
H.C. SHIV 906.apl1021.24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1021 OF 2024
Sandip Dinkar Patil ...Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Ms. Tanvi Tapkire for the Applicant. Mr. N. B. Patil A.P.P. for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
DATED : 27th SEPTEMBER, 2024
P. C. :
- . Learned Advocate for the Applicant seeks time to implead the
first informant as the party Respondent.
- Leave to amend.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sandip Dinkar Patil
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
SHYAM C. CHANDAK
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Meghdoot Co-Operative Housing Society Limited through Its Chairman Saurabh Daftary vs Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Mumbai Division, Mumbai, Malhotra House
Anand Lodha vs Vasudev Dayaram Navani and 36 Ors.
Ardeshir Behram Dubash vs State of Maharashtra through Government Pleader, High Court, Bombay
Ricardo Construction Private Limited vs Yusuf K Dohadwalla and 2 Ors.