Criminal appeal mentioned before the High Court at Bombay, Nagpur Bench. Respondent No.2 was served and present; legal aid counsel was appointed to represent respondent No.2. The appellant was directed to furnish the appeal memo and documents. Matter adjourned after Christmas Vacation, 2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
05.apeal.683.24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.683 OF 2024
(Shubham s/o Dashrath Khatri Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Mr. R.P. Durge, Advocate for the appellant. Ms S. Haider, APP for the State.
CORAM:- URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED :- DECEMBER 12, 2024
Heard.
(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)
*Divya
Shubham s/o Dashrath Khatri
State of Maharashtra
Respondent No. 2
Urmila Joshi-Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
