Two criminal appeals were withdrawn by learned advocates on instructions. The High Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the appeals as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw appeals granted; appeals dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:6103
criapel1130-23.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1130 OF 2023
Shaikh Aavej Shaikh Anwar APPELLANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT
Mr. Joydeep Chatterji h/f Mr. P. A. Bhosle, Advocate for appellant Mr. A. R. Kale, APP for respondent - State
Mr. N. S. Salunke h/f Mr. A. T. Jadhavar, Advocate for R-3
WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.59 OF 2024
Mohd Samir Shaikh Ibrahim Khan Shakikh @ Wasim Khan APPELLANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & Another RESPONDENTS
Mr. C. C. Deshpande with Mr.Tapan K.Sant, Advocate for appellant Mr. A. R. Kale, APP for respondent - State Mr. N.S.Saluke h/f Mr. A.T.Jadhavar, Advocate for respondent No.2
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]
DATE : 19th MARCH, 2024
ORDER :
[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE
drp/criapel1130-23.doc
Shaikh Aavej Shaikh Anwar
The State of Maharashtra
Mohd Samir Shaikh Ibrahim Khan Shakikh @ Wasim Khan
The State of Maharashtra & Another
Nitin B. Suryawanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
