Two anticipatory bail applications were argued on merits; relief not being inclined to be granted, the applicants sought and obtained permission to withdraw both applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 19-ABA-22-24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2024
SADASHIV S/O JAYWANT FARANDE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 2024
RAMCHANDRA HANUMANT NETKE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Mr. Narayan B. Narwade, Advocate for Applicant Mr. A.R. Kale, APP for Respondents/State
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. DATE : 18th MARCH, 2024
PER COURT :
withdrawn.
(NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
Sadashiv s/o Jaywant Farande
The State of Maharashtra
Ramchandra Hanumant Netke
Nitin B. Suryawanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
