Appellants in a criminal appeal sought leave to withdraw, producing a signed instruction letter from their advocate. The court permitted withdrawal and disposed of the appeal as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k 1/1 31 cri apeal 532.24 as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.532 OF 2024
Sudam Shankar Jori & Ors. V/S
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
....Appellants
....Respondents
Ms. Saili N. Ohuru for the Appellants. Mr. Ashok R. Metkari, APP for Respondent No.1/State. Mr. Rohan Hogle i/b Mr. Sahilesh Chavan for Complainant/Respondent No.2.
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 24 JUNE 2024.
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the Appellants, places on record copy of the letter signed by the Appellants instructing the Advocate to withdraw the Appeal. She would accordingly submit that the Appellants be permitted to withdraw the Appeal. The Criminal Appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM RAJALINGAM KATKAM KATKAM Date: 2024.06.28 10:50:41 +0530
Page No. 1 of 1
katkam
Sudam Shankar Jori
The State of Maharashtra
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
