Chandevdas Ramanand Das v. the Union Territory of Daman and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal appeal concerning compensation awarded to a victim girl under the Victims Assistance Scheme 2012. The court directed the public prosecutor to ascertain whether the awarded amount had been disbursed and adjourned the matter.
What the court decided
Digitally signed by HEMANT 20.app325.24.doc HEMANT CHANDERSEN CHANDERSEN SHIV SHIV Date: 2024.07.04 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY 17:15:18 +0530 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
20.app325.24.doc
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.325 OF 2024
Chandevdas Ramanand Das .... Appellant. versus The Union Territory of Daman & Ors. .... Respondents
Mrs. Farhana Shah for the Appellant.
Mr. Harsh Dedhia i/b Mr. Hiten S. Venegavkar for Respondent No.1UT.
Ms. Sakshee P. Chavan, appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATE : 27th JUNE, 2024
P.C. :
- It appears from the impugned judgment and order, that
compensation of Rs.2,50,000/- has been awarded to the victim-girl
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Chandevdas Ramanand Das
- respondent
The Union Territory of Daman
- respondent
Respondent No.2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil
- Order 2 · Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil
- Order 3 — this page · Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil
- Order 4 · Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil
- Order 5 · Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil
- Order 6
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court