Appeal argued on merits; court not inclined to grant relief, appellant sought and obtained permission to withdraw the appeal.
Permission to withdraw appeal; appeal disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:7944
1 930-CrApl-167-24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 167 OF 2024
NAGNATH DATTARO BHOSALE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr. Yogesh P. Deshmukh, Advocate for Appellant Mrs. P.V. Diggikar, APP for Respondents/State Mr. Arvind G. Jadhav, Advocate for Respondent No.3
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.
DATE : 17th APRIL, 2024
PER COURT :
(NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
Nagnath Dattaro Bhosale
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.3
Nitin B. Suryawanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
