Allowed

Abhijeet @ Lara Sunil Kadam v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC17 Apr 2024ABA/50/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an anticipatory bail application. The High Court allowed the application, confirming interim protection previously granted. The court noted prima facie doubts regarding the applicant's involvement due to mobile location evidence and a history of past FIRs between parties.

What did the court decide?

The anticipatory bail application is allowed, confirming interim protection. The applicant is directed to attend the concerned police station when called and not tamper with prosecution evidence until

Abhijeet @ Lara Sunil Kadam Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-AUG:8056

¶2

949-ABA-50-24 1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 50 OF 2024

¶5

Abhijeet @ Lara Sunil Kadam … Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another … Respondents

¶6

Kawade Shrikant G., Advocate for Applicant

¶7

Mr. Shrikant G. Kawade, Advocate for Applicant Mr. A.R. Kale, APP for Respondents – State

¶8

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]

¶9

DATE : 17^th APRIL, 2024

¶10

ORDER :

¶11

Applicant apprehends arrest in connection with Crime No.213 of 2023, registered with Parli City Police Station, District-Beed for offences punishable under sections 436, 427 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

FIR is lodged by Rohit Jitendra Modi alleging that, on 25.11.2023, in the midnight, while he along with his family members was sleeping, they felt that window of their house is opened by somebody. Therefore, they got up and noticed that saree and blanket in the house is burning. Therefore, there was alarm and they came out of the house. At that time, they

1 of 3

S.P. Rane

949-ABA-50-24

found the glass of window is broken. They also heard the accused saying “set the motorcycle on fire”. At that time, they found the applicant, co-accused Amar Bendre, Sairaj Bhosale and one unknown person were present. Thereafter, Amar Bendre, set sport bike of informant bearing No.MH-44/X-4927 on fire. So also applicant was found provoking them to pour petrol on informant’s mother and set her on fire.

¶18

Heard learned advocate for applicant and learned APP for respondents – State. Perused the investigation papers.

¶19

Record indicates that, there is two days delay in lodging the FIR. In the FIR, only allegation levelled against applicant is that he was instigating co-accused no.2 for throwing petrol on informant’s mother. No overt act of assault is attributed to applicant. During investigation, CDRs were obtained to trace mobile location of applicant and it appears that his mobile location was found at his home. Therefore, prima facie, over implication of applicant in the present crime cannot be ruled out in the facts of the present case. It is a matter of record that, earlier, mother of applicant has lodged FIR against informant and others in the year 2022 at C.R. No.0248/2022, which is registered for offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 452, 327, 324, 323, 504,

2 of 3

S.P. Rane

949-ABA-50-24 3

506 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 4/25 of the Arms Act. In the light of these facts, applicant’s involvement in the present crime, prima facie, appears to be doubtful.

¶24

Application is therefore allowed by confirming interim protection granted to applicant by order dated 18.01.2024.

¶25

Till filing of charge-sheet, applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when called by the Investigating Officer. Applicant shall not tamper prosecution evidence.

¶26

[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE

¶27

3 of 3

¶28

S.P. Rane

Abhijeet @ Lara Sunil Kadam v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhijeet @ Lara Sunil Kadam v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yuvraj S/O Hiraji Bhamre Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bhimrao Bhaskar Khairnar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Sanjay Pitambar Khairnar Vs Bhimrao Bhaskar Khairnar and Another

Nagnath Dattaro Bhosale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sunita Kirti Chudasama Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Suraj Rambhau Jogdand Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another