Vilas Kashinath Rathod v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court, on being informed that the appellant was represented by counsel, allowed the appellant to stand over to a future date without disposing of the matter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-52
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CR. APPEAL NO. 1160 OF 2024
Vilas Kashinath Rathod ....APPELLANT
V/S
State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
WITH
CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4510 OF 2024
In
Cr. Appeal 1160 OF 2024
Vilas Kashinath Rathod ....PETITIONER V/S
State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
None for the Appellant Ms P N Dabholkar, APP for State Respondent Mr Amol Anbhule, PSI from Manikpur Poice Stn.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vilas Kashinath Rathod
- respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Coram
M. M. Sathaye
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court