Ranga @ Mayappa Mhalappa Mane and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal appeal adjourned as Respondent No.2 failed to engage counsel despite repeated opportunities; a legal aid advocate was appointed for Respondent No.2, and interim protection continued until the next hearing date.
What the court decided
Neeta Sawant 29-CRI. APPEAL-1089-=2024.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1089 OF 2024
Ranga @ Mayappa Mhalappa Mane
and anr. ….Appellant
: Versus :
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ….Respondents
Mr. Mithilesh Mishra , for the Appellant.
Ms. Rashmi S. Tendulkar, APP for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. S.S. Pawar, HC from Mangalvedha Police Station, Solapur (Rural) present.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Dated : 4 DECEMBER 2024.
P.C. :
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ranga @ Mayappa Mhalappa Mane
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No.2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court