Appeal under Section 14-A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act seeking bail; court disinclined, appeal withdrawn with liberty to refile if trial makes no progress.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 apeal102.24.O.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.102 OF 2024
(Purushottam Ramchandra Walke (In Jail) Vs. The State of Maharashtra thr. PSO PS Washim City, Dist. Washim and another)
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar’s Orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
Mr. Y. J. Chandurkar, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. U. R. Phasate, APP for Respondent No.1/State. Mr. R. N. Ghuge, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: URMILA JOSHI PHALKE, J. DATE: 16th APRIL, 20 24.
The appeal is preferred under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
apeal102.24.O.odt
2
JUDGE
NSN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Purushottam Ramchandra Walke
The State of Maharashtra thr. PSO PS Washim City, Dist. Washim
Respondent No.2
Urmila Joshi Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
