Two applicants sought pre-arrest bail in separate applications. After hearing counsel and reviewing investigation papers, the court expressed disinclination to grant pre-arrest bail, and the applicants withdrew the applications, which were disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
aba133.24+O.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.133 OF 2024
(Manish s/o Ashok Ganvir Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its PSO PS Bhandara, Tq. & Dist. Bhandara)
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.6 OF 2024
(Shyamkumar Birshiram Bilawane Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its PSO PS Bhandara, Tq. & Dist. Bhandara)
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar’s Orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
Mr. C. S. Dhore, Advocate for Applicant [ABA 133/2024] Mr. R. R. Vyas, Advocate for Applicant [ABA 6/2024]. Mr. U. R. Phasate, APP for Non-Applicant/State [ABA 133/2024 & 6/2024].
CORAM: URMILA JOSHI PHALKE, J. DATE: 16th APRIL, 20 24.
Both these applications are seeking for pre-arrest
bail.
JUDGE
NSN
Manish s/o Ashok Ganvir
Shyamkumar Birshiram Bilawane
State of Maharashtra thr. its PSO PS Bhandara, Tq. & Dist. Bhandara
Urmila Joshi Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
