Shri. Balu @ Balasaheb Baburao Jadhav and Others v. M/S. Adhya Properties Limited Thr. Partner and Other

Bombay HC17 Dec 2024AO/924/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim order only. Appeal from Order against rejection of an injunction application in a suit arising from a Development Agreement between property owners and a developer was taken up for admission; the Court issued notice to the respondents, permitted service by appellants, required replies, and listed the appeal on 28 January 2025. No substantive decision was made.

What the court decided

AI extract

Shri. Balu @ Balasaheb Baburao Jadhav and Others vs M/S… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

P4(ii)(a).aost.1693.24.doc

¶2

Ajay

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO. 1693 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 1696 OF 2024 IN

¶5

APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO. 1693 OF 2024

¶6

Balu @ Balasaheb Baburao Jadhav and Ors. .. Appellants Versus M/s. Adhya Properties Limited and Ors. .. Respondents

¶7

Mr. Prathmesh T. Bhanuwanshe, Advocate i/by Mr. Sanjay P. Shinde for Appellants.

¶8

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : DECEMBER 17, 2024.

¶9

P.C.:

¶10

1. Not on Board. Mentioned. Taken on Board.

¶11

2. Heard Mr. Bhanuwanshe, learned Advocate for Appellants.

¶12

3. Today, after allowing Interim Application (St.) No.1695 of

¶13

2024, present Appeal From Order is taken up immediately for admission.

¶14

4. Present Appeal From Order is directed against rejection of Exhibit “5” injunction order passed in Special Civil Suit No.989 of 2023 by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune.

¶15

5. Appellants are the owners of the property. They entered into the Development Agreement dated 02.05.2013 and also executed a General Power of Attorney in favour of Respondent – Developer to develop the Suit property.

¶16

Corrected / Modified order as per speaking to the minutes of order dated 06.01.2025. 1 of 3

¶17

P4(ii)(a).aost.1693.24.doc

¶18

6. In view of the impugned order dated 08.08.2023 appended at Exhibit “A” – page No.16 of the Appeal prima facie it is seen that there was a condition in the Development Agreement of dividing the constructed area between the parties. The construction of building Nos. A and B is already over whereas construction of building Nos.C, D and E is presently not yet commenced. Grievance of the Plaintiffs is that they have not been handed over the promised return of developed property.

¶19

7. The impugned order is decided on the basis of balance convenience between the parties and it also records that some of the construction of the flats infact handed over to the Plaintiffs.

¶20

8. The impugned order proceeds on the premise that permission for remaining construction of property have been obtained by Respondent and therefore injunction has been refused.

¶21

9. In view of the above, unless I hear the Respondents who are Defendants in the Suit proceedings, no further order cannot be passed as the ongoing construction / development will be affected.

¶22

10. Hence, issue notice to Respondents. Humdast permitted.

¶23

11. In addition to Court notice, Appellants are permitted to serve

¶24

a copy of the Appeal From Order and this order on the Respondents and inform them about the next date of hearing by any permissible mode of service and file appropriate Affidavit of service with tangible proof thereof on or before the next date.

¶25

Corrected / Modified order as per speaking to the minutes of order dated 06.01.2025. 2 of 3

¶26

P4(ii)(a).aost.1693.24.doc

¶27

12. After receiving notice, Respondents are directed to file their

¶28

Affidavit-in-Reply on or before the next date, if so desired.

¶29

13. Respondents are directed to remain present in Court on the next adjourned date either by themselves or through Advocate.

¶30

14. List the Appeal From Order and Interim Application on Board on 28^th January 2025 .

¶31

[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

¶32

Ajay

¶33

Digitally signed AJAYTRAMBAK by AJAYTRAMBAKUGALMUGALE UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.01.06 14:35:02 +0530

¶34

Corrected / Modified order as per speaking to the minutes of order dated 06.01.2025. 3 of 3

Shri. Balu @ Balasaheb Baburao Jadhav and Others v. M/S. Adhya Properties Limited Thr. Partner and Other

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Shri. Balu @ Balasaheb Baburao Jadhav and Others v. M/S. Adhya Properties Limited Thr. Partner and Other

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rahul Madhukar Navalkar and 2 Others vs Amit Alias Prashant Neelkanth Navalkar and 4 Others

Jayakumar G. Nadar vs Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Mukesh Sukhdeo Bhalerao vs the State of Maharashtra through to Be Served through Govt. Pleader(O.S.) and 6 Ors.

Shehzad Adil Nensey vs Kishwar Adil Nensey and 5 Ors.

Sujita Narayan Nakhwa vs Ravindra Baburao Patil

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others vs Neelkamal Realtors and Builders Private Limited