Appeal from order against Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and a developer; counsel sought interim relief which the court declined, whereupon the appeal was not pressed. The Appeal from Order and Interim Application were dismissed as withdrawn without entering into the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21 AO-793-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by HUSENBASHA HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN RAHAMAN NADAF NADAF Date: 2024.11.18 19:59:50 +0530
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 793 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 14580 OF 2024 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 793 OF 2024
Farzana Firoz Khan ...Appellant Versus The Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai And Anr ...Respondents
Mr. Pradeep J. Thorat a/w. Mr. Janardan S. Yadav, for Appellant. Mr. Atul Damle, Sr. Adv., Mr. Prasanna S. Tare, Ms. Akshada Shetty. Ms. Dakshata Valte & Mr. Sumit Khandare for Respondent N.2.
CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J. DATE : 18th NOVEMBER, 2024
P.C. :
Page 1 of 2
Husen
21 AO-793-2024.doc
Page 2 of 2
Husen
Farzana Firoz Khan
The Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai
Respondent No.2 (Developer)
M.M. Sathaye
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
