Indira Bhaskar Shetty and Another v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC27 Jun 2024AO/403/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal against dismissal of a Notice of Motion seeking protection from municipal demolition notices under section 314 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Interim protection previously granted was further continued until the admission hearing.

What did the court decide?

Interim protection against municipal notices extended till 12.06.2024; matter listed for admission on 11.06.2024.

Indira Bhaskar Shetty and Another vs Municipal Corporation… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Digitally signed by ANANT ANANT KRISHNA KRISHNA NAIK NAIK Date: 2024.05.29 20:33:17 +0530

¶2

7.AO.403.2024.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 403 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 9130 OF 2024 IN

¶5

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 403 OF 2024

¶6

Indira Bhaskar Shetty And Another Versus

¶7

...Appellants

¶8

Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai And Others ...Respondents

¶9

Mr. Ranjeev Carvalho a/w Ms Dikshita More i/b. Mr. Bipin Joshi for the Appellants.

¶10

Mr. R. Y. Sirsikar for the Respondent-BMC

¶11

CORAM : M. M. SATHAYE, J.

¶12

DATED : 29 MAY 2024 (Vacation Court)

¶13

P.C.:

¶14

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

¶15

The Appellants/Original Plaintiffs have challenged the impugned

¶16

order dated 23.04.2024 passed in Notice of Motion No. 4613 of 2014 by AdHoc Judge, City Civil Court Room No. 4, Greater Mumbai. By the impugned

¶17

order, the Appellant’s Notice of Motion seeking protection from the

¶18

impugned notices issued by the Municipal Corporation, is dismissed.

¶19

Learned Counsel for the Appellant has invited this Court’s attention to

¶20

the order of the same date i.e. 23.04.2024 by which earlier interim order

¶21

akn 1/2

¶22

7.AO.403.2024.doc

¶23

(dated 10.12.2014) was continued for a period of four weeks from the date of the uploading of the order.

¶24

It is common ground before the Court that this protection was extended till 27.05.2024. Learned Counsel for the Appellants, on instructions, asserts that in last two days, the Respondent – Corporation has not taken any action against the Appellants’ structures involved. Statement is accepted.

¶25

Learned Counsel for the Respondent-Municipal Corporation has opposed the extension of the interim protection and points out that matter involves action under section 314 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

¶26

Considering that the Appellants were protected till 27.05.2024, based

¶27

on the assertion made by them, as recorded above, the interim protection granted on 10.12.2014 by the Trial Court and continued by order dated

¶28

23.04.2024, is further continued till 12.06.2024.

¶29

Place the matter for admission on 11.06.2024 .

¶30

All concerned to act on authenticated or digitally signed copy of this

¶31

order.

¶32

2/2

¶33

akn

Indira Bhaskar Shetty and Another v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indira Bhaskar Shetty and Another v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Maneesh Bawa vs Bps Aastha Co. Op Housing Society Ltd.

Indubai Yashwant Kedari vs Harilal Lakhamichand Hinduja and Ors.

Dilipsingh Jitendra Singh Thakur vs Brahmadutt Singh Thakur (Huf) and 18 Ors.

Sabina Lakdawala vs Feroz Lakdawala and 8 Ors.

Shri. Abhijeet Tulshiram Kadam vs Sau. Snehal Gulab Ghule

Snehal Gulab Ghule vs Abhijeet Tulshiram Kadam