Adjournment order in an appeal from order; counsel for respondent MCGM sought time to take instructions, matter listed for a future date with the earlier status-quo order continuing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P-7-AO-302-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 302 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7635 OF 2024 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 302 OF 2024
… Shaheen Mohammed Hayat Khan Appellant Versus The Asstt. Commissioner and Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Suresh Sabrad i/b P. S. Sabrad, for the Appellant.
Ms. Seena Rawade, for Respondent No.1-MCGM.
CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.
DATED : 12th JUNE, 2024. P.C.
Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.
to take instructions.
3 List on 4th July, 2024.
REKHA PRAKASH PATIL
Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2024.06.13 11:24:50 +0530
1 of 2
Rekha Patil
P-7-AO-302-2024.doc
[PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]
2 of 2
Rekha Patil
Shaheen Mohammed Hayat Khan
The Asstt. Commissioner
Prithviraj K. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
