Pre-arrest bail application; the court expressed disinclination to grant bail after reviewing investigation papers, and the applicant withdrew the application, which was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2024:BHC-NAG:3928
920.aba.94.24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.94 OF 2024
(Prashant s/o Shyamakant Bagaddeo Vs. State of Maharashtra)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's order
Mr. A. Bandre, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. U.R. Phasate, APP for the State.
CORAM:- URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED :- APRIL 3, 2024
The application is for grant of pre-arrest bail.
(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)
*Divya
Prashant s/o Shyamakant Bagaddeo
State of Maharashtra
Urmila Joshi-Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
