Anticipatory bail application under consideration; the court expressed disinclination after hearing counsel and reviewing investigation papers, and the applicant sought permission to withdraw, which was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
aba104.24.O.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.104 OF 2024
(Atul Pandurang Kale Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its PSO PS Jaripatka, Nagpur)
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar’s Orders.
Mr. R. R. Vyas, Advocate for Applicant.
Ms. S. V. Kolhe, APP for Non-Applicant/State.
CORAM: URMILA JOSHI PHALKE, J. DATE: 3 rd APRIL, 20 24.
After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant to some extent and after going through the investigation papers, I have shown my disinclination.
JUDGE
NSN
Atul Pandurang Kale
State of Maharashtra thr. its PSO PS Jaripatka, Nagpur
Urmila Joshi Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
