Anticipatory bail application dismissed. The applicant's earlier bail was cancelled, the challenge failed in this Court and before the Supreme Court, and she never surrendered despite directions; a recent Sessions Court application was also rejected. Finding no substance, the High Court dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
911-aba-771.24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 771 OF 2024
Surekha Ramdas Shivale … Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Ashok Mundargi, Senior Advocate, i/by Ms. Arazoo Y. Mujawar for the Applicant.
Mr. Mayur S. Sonavane, APP for Respondent-State.
Mr. Bhagwan S. Gurav, PSI, EOW, Pimpri Chinchwad.
CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 30th JULY 2024
P.C. :
. The documents available on record, on the face of it, show that there is no substance in the present application. The reasons for the same are as follows :
bipin prithiani
2
911-aba-771.24.doc
MANISH PITALE, J.
BIPINDHARMENDERPRITHIANI Digitally signed by BIPINDHARMENDER PRITHIANIDate: 2024.07.31 10:27:33+0530
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail could be granted to an applicant who repeatedly failed to surrender despite cancellation of earlier bail and rejection of her SLP by the Supreme Court?
Surekha Ramdas Shivale
The State of Maharashtra
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
