Anticipatory bail application argued at length on merits; the court was not inclined to grant relief, whereupon the applicant withdrew the application, which was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:4560
{1} 8-ABA-356-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 356 OF 2024
Akalak Khan Asharaph Khan ….Applicant
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another …..Respondents
Mr. Rohit Patwardhan, Advocate for applicant. Mr. S.B. Jadhav, APP for respondents.
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]
DATE : 04th MARCH, 2024
ORDER :
withdrawn.
[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]
Bhagyawant Punde
Akalak Khan Asharaph Khan
The State Of Maharashtra
Nitin B. Suryawanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
