Shaikh Khaled Abdul Khayyum and Another v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCABA/13/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:6039
drp
{1}
aba13-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.13 OF 2024
The State of Maharashtra and Another RESPONDENTS
Mr. Saeed S. Shaikh, Advocate for the applicants Mr. S. P. Sonpawale, APP for respondent - State
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 15th MARCH, 2024
ORDER :
{2}
aba13-24.doc
Hibbanama was used to transfer said plot. Thus, applicant and co-accused prepared forged and bogus Hibbanama and cheated the informant.
[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE
drp/aba13-24.doc
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to applicants apprehending arrest in proceedings for cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy.
Whether granting interim protection without pretrial custodial detention satisfies the conditions of the application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shaikh Khaled Abdul Khayyum
Pathan Mohd Shakir Khan
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin B. Suryawanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court