Harshad Ram Karale v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order in an anticipatory bail application. One week's time granted to annex additional documents; matter stood over to 2 January 2025 at the counsel's request. No substantive decision was taken on the application.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
17-aba-3396-2024.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 3396 of 2024
Harshad Ram Karale … Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr Ankesh Thakur a/w Ms Isha Laddha, for the applicant. Mr M G Patil, APP, for the respondent/ State.
Coram: R.N. Laddha, J. Date: 19 December 2024
P.C.:
. Time is extended by one week to annex the additional documents. At the request of learned counsel, stand over to 2 January 2025.
(R.N. Laddha, J.)
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.12.1919:16:13+0530
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Harshad Ram Karale
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
R.N. Laddha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court