Correction of a ministerial error in an earlier order in an anticipatory bail application. The corrected order extended time to file the reply and directed that no coercive action be taken against the applicant until the next hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2024.12.14 20:17:01 GONSALVES +0530
502.aba3354-24.docx
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 3354 of 2024
Ajit Singh Vag Singh Chouhan … Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
None for the applicant.
Mr Arfan Sait, APP, for respondent No.1/ State.
Coram: R.N. Laddha, J. Date: 14 December 2024.
P.C.:
Page 1 of 2
14 December 2024
502.aba3354-24.docx
sg
the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case, and is neither the recipient or beneficiary of the alleged funds.
(R.N. Laddha, J.)
Page 2 of 2
14 December 2024
Ajit Singh Vag Singh Chouhan
The State of Maharashtra
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
