Single judge hearing where the court directed leave to implead the first informant as a respondent and stand the anticipatory bail application over for a future date.
Leave granted to implead the first informant as a respondent; application stood over.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43-aba-3317-2024.docx
Mamta Kale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 3317 of 2024
Sunil Bikas Das … Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Dr Nilesh Pawaskar a/w Ms Aparna Vhatkar a/w A R Rathod, for the applicant.
Mr M G Patil, APP, for the respondent/ State.
Coram: R.N. Laddha, J. Date: 9 December 2024.
P.C.:
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.12.0915:18:38+0530
(R.N. Laddha, J.)
Page 1 of 1
9 December 2024
Sunil Bikas Das
The State of Maharashtra
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
