Mudssir Mubin Kureshi v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court confirmed an interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant facing charges of cow smuggling. The court held that no further incriminating evidence existed against him despite a co-accused statement, thus ordering further interrogation and confirming the bail.
What did the court decide?
Interim anticipatory bail granted vide order dated 26.03.2024 is confirmed and the application is disposed of.
What the court decided
315.24ABA
2024:BHC-AUG:26652
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
5 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 315 OF 2024
MUDSSIR MUBIN KURESHI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER
Advocate for the applicant : Mr.M.P.Kale h/f.Mr.S.A.Ambad APP for Respondent-State : Mrs.M.L.Sangit
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 11.11.2024
P.C. :
1] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.
2] The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 33/2024 registered at Ausa Police Station, Tq.Ausa, District Latur, for the offences punishable under sections 429, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5, 5 (b) and 9 of the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail granted earlier shall be confirmed given the co-accused statement and lack of further incriminating evidence.
Whether custodial interrogation is necessary in view of the animal preservation offence charges.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
MUDSSIR MUBIN KURESHI
- respondent
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Coram
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court