The Court directed the Appellate Court to decide a pending application for restoration of a dismissed appeal within ten weeks and maintained status quo for the same period.
Direction given to Appellate Court to decide restoration application within ten weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:26380
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
921 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10385 OF 2024 IN WP/15501/2019
Pundlik Sampat Karpe VERSUS
Dilip Pandhari Karpe And Others
... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Chavan Rajendra N. Advocate for Respondents No.1 and 3 in WP : Mr. M. U. Shelke
… WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 15501 OF 2019
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
Dated : October 24, 2024.
PER COURT :-
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )
vj gawade/-.
Page 1 of 1
Pundlik Sampat Karpe
Dilip Pandhari Karpe And Others
Arun R. Pedneker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
