Arif Abdul Rashid Shaikh and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim hearing in an anticipatory bail application. Applicants undertook to refund Rs.5 lakhs to the first informant and file consent terms; the informant raised no objection to interim protection.
What did the court decide?
No coercive action against applicants till 29 November 2024; leave to amend granted.
What the court decided
SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON GONSALVES JOHNSON Date: 2024.10.25 GONSALVES 19:37:28 +0530
904.aba2978-24.docx
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No.2978 of 2024
Arif Abdul Rashid Shaikh & Anr.
… Applicants
versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
… Respondents
Mr Arif Siddiqui, a/w. Ms Farheen Sheikh, Mr Noman Khan and Mr Siraj Ansari, for the applicants.
Ms Supriya Kak, APP, for respondent/State.
Mr BJ Shaikh, for the intervenor/respondent No.2.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Arif Abdul Rashid Shaikh & Anr.
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- intervenor
Respondent No.2 (first informant, added on amendment)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court