Abdul Khalid Halim Khan v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application; counsel contended the crime was registered without court permission after the complaint was closed, and offered cooperation. The State sought time and undertook not to arrest the applicant till the next date. Matter adjourned to 3 January 2025.
What the court decided
Chitra Sonawane 906-aba-2879-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No.2879 of 2024
Abdul K H Khan
…... Applicant.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …... Respondents.
Mr Khwaja Shaikh a/w Ilyas Shaikh for the applicant. Mr Swapnil Pednekar APP for respondent/State. Mr Devendra Patil for respondent No.2.
Coram : R.N.Laddha, J. Date : 4 December 2024.
P.C. :
The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the investigating officer, by a letter dated 2 March 2024, informed the applicant that the complaint filed by the first informant against him had been closed. However, without obtaining permission from the competent Court, the investigating officer later registered the crime.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Abdul K H Khan
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court