This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
910&911-aba-2839.24 & anr.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2839 OF 2024
WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2840 OF 2024
… Vipul Dileep Lathi Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Satyavrat Joshi a/w Deva Shinde and Mr. Raviraj Paramane i/by Jaydeep Vaishampayan for the Applicants. Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP for Respondent-State.
Mr. Gautam G. Sarwade, API, Sarkarwada Police Station, Nashik.
CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 22nd OCTOBER 2024
P.C. :
. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APPs for the respondent-State.
bipin prithiani
2
910&911-aba-2839.24 & anr.doc
bipin prithiani
3
910&911-aba-2839.24 & anr.doc
sufficient allegations in the statement, leading to registration of the FIR, to indicate the role of the applicants and this Court may not show any indulgence.
bipin prithiani
4
910&911-aba-2839.24 & anr.doc
amount.
MANISH PITALE, J.
BIPINDHARMENDERPRITHIANI Digitally signed by BIPINDHARMENDERPRITHIANIDate: 2024.10.22 18:17:34+0530
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interim anticipatory bail protection should be granted to applicants apprehending arrest in FIR No. 0213 of 2024 given allegations rooted in civil disputes between two entities.
5 provisions across 1 enactments
Harshal Govind Jethale
Pravin Kumar Purohit
Vipul Dileep Lathi
The State of Maharashtra
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court