This single-paragraph order grants anticipatory bail to the applicant by preventing coercive action until the next hearing, conditioned on the applicant's undertaking to deposit a due amount within two weeks.
No coercive action against the applicant shall continue till the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
46-aba-2675-2024.docx
Mamta Kale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2675 of 2024 Jagdish Kisan Bale … Applicant
… Applicant
versus The State of Maharashtra
… Respondent
Mr Avinash A Ovhal, for the applicant. Ms Supriya Kak, APP, for the respondent/ State.
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.11.1116:28:37+0530
Coram: R.N. Laddha, J.
Date: 11 November 2024
P.C.:
. The learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, submits that the applicant, to show his bonafides, will deposit the entire due amount within two weeks from today positively.
Page 1 of 1
11 November 2024
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in the pending criminal proceedings.
Whether the applicant's undertaking to deposit the due amount justifies coercive action prevention.
Jagdish Kisan Bale
The State of Maharashtra
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
