Yogesh Dnyaneshwar Ghatkar v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicant in an anticipatory bail application sought leave to withdraw; the court granted leave and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Applicant in an anticipatory bail application sought leave to withdraw; the court granted leave and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
18-aba-2625-2024.doc
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.10.0917:34:47+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2625 of 2024
Yogesh Dnyaneshwar Ghatkar ...Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
Ms. Sofiya Shaikh a/w. Mr. Mohd. Ahmed i/b. Mr. Vijendra Mishra, for the Applicant.
Mr. M. G. Patil, APP for Respondent – State.
Mr. Arun Rajput, Legal Aid Appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2. PI Sanjay Lad, Borivali Police Station, Mumbai is present.
Coram: R. N. Laddha, J. Date: 9 October 2024
P.C.
. The learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave
to withdraw this application. Leave granted as prayed for.
R. N. Laddha, J.
Page 1 of 1
Yogesh Dnyaneshwar Ghatkar
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court