Amol Babasaheb Suryawanshi v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application adjourned; court directed police to obtain call detail records directly from the telecom service provider rather than rely on the CDR maintained by Paud Police Station, and continued earlier interim protection.
What did the court decide?
Interim protection granted earlier continued till 20 January 2025.
What the court decided
4-ABA2579-2024.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.12.18 12:05:27 +0530
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2579 OF 2024
Amol Babasaheb Suryawanshi ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. …Respondents
Mr. Shailesh Kharat, for the Applicant.
Mr. A. A. Naik, APP for the State/Respondent No.1. Mr. Kushal Mor, (through VC) Appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 17th DECEMBER, 2024
PC:-
- Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Amol Babasaheb Suryawanshi
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court