Deepak Tarun Shah v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim order in an anticipatory bail application: reply affidavit and rejoinder permitted within three weeks, applicant directed to attend the police station and cooperate with investigation on specified dates, with protection against coercive action till the next hearing.
What the court decided
SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2024.09.26 GONSALVES 15:55:05 +0530
17.aba2549-24.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No.2549 of 2024
... Deepak Tarun Shah Applicant v/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents
Mr Manish Gala, a/w. Mr Nilesh Gala, Mr Minil Shah and Mr Amir Naje, i/b. Law Square, for the Applicant. Ms Supriya Kak, APP, for Respondent State.
Mr Jitesh Agarwal, a/w. Ms Sunaina Chakravarty and Ms Saaniya Arfan Sait, for the Intervenor.
Coram : R.N. Laddha, J. Date : 26 September 2024
P.C. :
- . Heard.
- Liberty to file a reply affidavit and the rejoinder if any. The same shall be filed within three weeks from today with an advance copy to be served on other side. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the co-accused have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Deepak Tarun Shah
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
R.N. Laddha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Charan Trimbak Patil vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Amol Gulab Wadekar and Others Vs Deepak Narayanrao Gajbhiye
Joshaba Labour Co-Operative Society Ltd, Umersara, Thr. President, Sunil Tulsiram Punwatkar and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Co-Operative and Marketing, Mumbai and Ors.
Dr. Meena D/O Laxman Kapshikar Vs Vice Chancellor, Rashtra Sant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpuru Niversity, Nagpur and 3 Others