Umesh Pravin Rathod v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application adjourned as the investigating officer was absent; the State stated the applicant would not be arrested till the next hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAYSONAWANE SANJAYSONAWANE Date:2024.11.22 22:31:55 +0530
Chitra Sonawane 18-aba-2528-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No.2528 of 2024
Umesh Pravin Rathod …... Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra …... Respondent.
Mr Alokkumar Srivastava i/by Vinod Chauhan for the applicant. Mr MG Patil,APP for Respondent/State.
Coram : R.N.Laddha, J. Date : 22 November 2024.
P.C. :
Learned APP seeks an accommodation as the investigating officer is not present and maintains his earlier statement that the applicant will not be arrested in the present crime till the next date. Stand over to 7 January 2025.
[ R. N. Laddha,J. ]
Page No. 1 of 1 ____________________________________________ 22 November 2024.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Umesh Pravin Rathod
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
R.N. Laddha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court