Anticipatory bail application withdrawn by the applicant after the court was informed that a proclamation had already been issued against him; liberty sought and granted to pursue another remedy.
Liberty to withdraw the application with leave to seek an appropriate remedy in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale 25-aba-2465-2024.docx
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitally signed byMAMTA AMAR KALEDate: 2024.10.2316:49:33 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2465 of 2024
Rahul Hariraj Sharma … Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr Heena Shaikh i/b. Mr. Jeevandatt Argade, for the applicant. Mr Arfan Sait, APP, for the respondent/ State. PI Nilesh Lodhi, Bangur Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, is present.
Coram: R.N. Laddha, J. Date: 23 October 2024
P.C.:
. The learned APP informs the Court that proclamation has already been issued against the applicant. In view of that, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw this application with liberty to seek appropriate remedy available in law. Liberty granted as prayed for.
Page 1 of 1
23 October 2024
Rahul Hariraj Sharma
The State of Maharashtra
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
