Deepak a. Shah v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail applications adjourned at the respondent's request due to counsel's unavailability. The State assured that the applicants would not be arrested until the next hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2024.12.13 GONSALVES 23:22:06 +0530
13.aba2350&2351-24.docx
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No.2350 of 2024
Vikas Vitthal Kumbhar … Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
With
Anticipatory Bail Application No.2351 of 2024
Deepak A Shah … Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vikas Vitthal Kumbhar
- applicant
Deepak A Shah
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Ramesh S/O Damodar Bode and Another Vs Western Coalfields Limited, Thr. Chairman Cum Managing Director, Nagpur and Others
Shri. Santosh Kawduji Bramhankar Vs Smt. Vibhawari Wd/O Shantaram Deshpande and Others
Smt. Devaki Wd/O Mamanchand Agrawal Vs Smt. Sudha Wd/O Prabhakar Vaidya and 2 Others
Pratik S/O. Prakash Kathade and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Others