Application to condone a 295-day delay in filing a first appeal. The court heard counsel, considered the application's reasons, condoned the delay, allowed and disposed of the application, and directed registration of the appeal.
Delay of 295 days in filing the appeal condoned; appeal permitted to be registered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22-CAF-1934-2016.doc
Shantanu Dhudum
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1934 OF 2016
IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 642 OF 2016
Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANTANU SHANKARSA SHANKARSA DHUDUM DHUDUM Date: 2024.03.07 14:42:41 +0530
Bhaskar Bajirao Nathe….Applicant
Versus
Suraj Raghunath Sandhanand & Anr.….Respondents
Mr. Rohit Gorade i/b Mr. R. N. Gite, Advocate for the Applicant.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 6th MARCH, 2024.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant.
2. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the
Applicant and the reasons mentioned in the Application, the delay of
295 days for filing the Appeal is condoned. The Application is allowed
and disposed of.
3. The Appeal be registered.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
1/1
Bhaskar Bajirao Nathe
Suraj Raghunath Sandhanand
Anr.
Shivkumar Dige
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court